U.S. v. Moussaoui, No. 03-4162 (4th Cir.) (333 F.3d 509) (June 26, 2003) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
Loaded on June 1, 2003
published in Punch and Jurists
June 09, 2003
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Appealable Issues/Orders.
Here the Court held that it was without authority to rule on the substantive question of whether it is fundamentally unfair for the Government to institute a criminal prosecution in the federal district court and then deny the defendant access to a potentially favorable witness, because the order of …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. $242,484.00, No. 01-16485 (11th Cir.) (351 F.3d 499) (June 30, 2003) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- U.S. v. Bennett, No. 02-3176 (7th Cir.) (332 F.3d 1094) (June 23, 2003) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Shimoda, No. 02-10188 (9th Cir.) (334 F.3d 846) (June 26, 2003) (Judge Edward Leavy)
- U.S. v. Camejo, No. 01-1572 (6th Cir.) (333 F.3d 669) (June 26, 2003) (Judge Joseph M. Hood)
- U.S. v. Villalobos, No. 01-30066 (9th Cir.) (333 F.3d 1070) (June 27, 2003) (Judge James R. Browning)
- U.S. v. Swinton, No. 01-1004 (3rd Cir.) (333 F.3d 481) (June 23, 2003) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)
- U.S. v. Moussaoui, No. 03-4162 (4th Cir.) (333 F.3d 509) (June 26, 2003) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Andis, No. 01-1272 (8th Cir.) (333 F.3d 886) (June 27, 2003) (Judge Michael J. Melloy)
- Coleman v. U.S., No. 01-2236 (2nd Cir.) (329 F.3d 77) (May 7, 2003) (Judge Robert D. Sack)
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit Announces State-Law Exceptions to Appeal Deadlines Preserve “Pending” Status Under AEDPA, Holding Belated-Appeal Procedures Toll Federal Habeas Limitations Period, April 1, 2026. Limitations, Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Appealable Issues/Orders, Failure to Address/Advise Defendant.
- California Court of Appeal Announces Plea Agreements Cannot Bar § 1172.1 Resentencing, Holds Merit-Based Denial of Petition Is Appealable, April 1, 2026. Appealable Issues/Orders, Abuse of Discretion Standard, De Novo Resentencing, Appellate Jurisdiction/Review, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- SCOTUS Announces Federal Prisoners May Seek Certiorari Review of Authorization Denials Under § 2255(h) and Are Not Subject to § 2244(b)(1)’s Bar on Previously Presented Claims, Feb. 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, AEDPA, Appealable Issues/Orders, Statutory Construction/Interpretation, Authority and Jurisdiction.
- Indiana Supreme Court Announces Whether Defendant’s Actions Were “Objectively Reasonable” Justifying Self-Defense Can Be Considered in Hindsight, Sept. 15, 2025. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Criminal Procedure, Appealable Issues/Orders.
- Shelby County DA Oversees Retesting After Forensic Analyst’s Dismissal for ‘Unethical Conduct’, July 1, 2025. Crime Labs, Appealable Issues/Orders, Sufficiency of Evidence, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of.
- Ninth Circuit Announces Issues Not Raised in Prior Appeal Are Not Waived on Subsequent Appeal Following De Novo Resentencing, Sept. 1, 2024. Appealable Issues/Orders, De Novo Resentencing.
- Third Circuit Announces COA Required for Federal Prisoner Appealing District Court’s Choice of Remedy in § 2255 Proceeding, Nov. 1, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Appealable Issues/Orders, Certificate of Appealability.
- Kansas Supreme Court: Defendants May File a Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence in Appellate Court While on Direct Review, Oct. 1, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Appealable Issues/Orders.
- Arizona Supreme Court: Trial Court’s Failure to Protect Defendant’s Right to Conflict-Free Counsel May Be Raised on Direct Appeal 16 Massachusetts Supreme Court: Error to Exclude Expert Testimony on Significance of Tattoo to Support Claim of Self-Defense, Aug. 15, 2021. Appealable Issues/Orders, Conflict of Interest.
- The Federal Habeas Corpus: Government’s Response and Your Reply, Aug. 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, Appealable Issues/Orders.