U.S. v. Angleton, No. CR. H-02-0040 (S.D.Tex.) (269 F.Supp.2d 892) (June 26, 2003) (Judge Lee H. Rosenthal)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2003
published in Punch and Jurists
September 08, 2003
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Daubert Standards.
In this case, District Judge Rosenthal denied a defendant’s motion to introduce expert testimony regarding aural spectrographic voice identification evidence (which is used to determine the identity of an unknown recorded speaker). After a detailed review of the science and protocols used, he concluded that the technique had questionable …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Pena, No. Crim. No. 02-10344-NG (D.Mass.) (268 F.Supp.2d 65) (June 2, 2003) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- Johnson v. Daley, No. 00-3981 (7th Cir.) (339 F.3d 582) (August 19, 2003) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- Canadian Coalition Against Death Penalty v. Ryan, No. CIV 02-1344-PHX-EHC (D.Ariz.) (269 F.Supp.2d 1199) (May 19, 2003) (Judge Earl H. Carroll)
- Rouse v. Lee, No. 01-12 (4th Cir.) (339 F.3d 238) (August 11, 2003) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Angleton, No. CR. H-02-0040 (S.D.Tex.) (269 F.Supp.2d 892) (June 26, 2003) (Judge Lee H. Rosenthal)
- U.S. v. Panfil, No. 02-15627 (11th Cir.) (338 F.3d 1299) (July 25, 2003) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Greger, No. 02-3739 (8th Cir.) (339 F.3d 666) (August 6, 2003) (Judge Laurie Smith Camp)
- McKevitt v. Pallasch, No. 03-2753 (7th Cir.) (339 F.3d 530) (August 8, 2003) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- Paine v. Massie, No. 01-6437 (10th Cir.) (339 F.3d 1194) (August 11, 2003) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly)
- Haugen v. Brosseau, No. 01-35954 (9th Cir.) (339 F.3d 857) (August 4, 2003) (Judge William A. Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Panfil, No. 02-15627 (11th Cir.) (338 F.3d 1299) (July 25, 2003) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Watkins, No. 02-2386 (3rd Cir.) (339 F.3d 167) (August 6, 2003) (Judge Thomas L. Ambro)
- U.S. v. Kincade, No. 02-50380 (9th Cir.) (345 F.3d 1095) (October 2, 2003) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- U.S. v. Brunshtein, No. 02-1345 (2nd Cir.) (344 F.3d 91) (September 9, 2003) (Judge Barrington D. Jr. Parker)
More from these topics:
- Maine Supreme Judicial Court Announces Trial Courts Must Rigorously Scrutinize Reliability of Expert Testimony in Unrecognized Forensic Fields, Holding Trial Court Erred in Admitting Forensic Podiatry Footprint-Comparison Testimony Without a Demonstrated, Feb. 1, 2026. Forensic Sciences, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Daubert Standards, Expert and Opinion Testimony, Improper Comments.
- Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Framework for Evaluating Extraordinary Motions for New Trial Based on Scientific Developments, Holding Trial Court Applied Incorrect Legal Standard in Denying “Shaken Baby Syndrome” Challenge, Feb. 1, 2026. Forensic Sciences, New Trial/Judgment of Acquittal, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Daubert Standards, Expert and Opinion Testimony.
- When AI Invents the Pixels: Challenging AI-Enhanced Video Evidence in Criminal Cases, Dec. 15, 2025. Authentication/Identification, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Writings, Recordings & Photographs, Daubert Standards, Scientific Testimony or Evidence.
- Generative Suspicion: What Defense Lawyers Must Know About AI-Generated Police Reports, Nov. 15, 2025. Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Daubert Standards, Witnesses - Examination of, Official Report, Brady/Giglio/Jencks Act Issues.
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Affirms Trial Court’s Exclusion of Expert Testimony on iPhone’s Frequent Location History Data as Not Sufficiently Reliable Under Daubert-Lanigan Standard, June 15, 2024. Cell Site Location Information ("CSLI"), Opinions and Expert Testimony, Daubert Standards.
- The Daniel Buffington Dilemma: Does His Expert Witness Testimony Satisfy Daubert?, Aug. 1, 2023. Death Penalty/Death Row, Daubert Standards, Expert and Opinion Testimony, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony.
- New Jersey Supreme Court Announces Adoption of Daubert-Type Standard for Criminal and Quasi-Criminal Cases in Assessing Admissibility of Expert Evidence Under Rule 702, March 15, 2023. Daubert Standards.
- Seventh Circuit Affirms Use Of “Some Evidence” Standard in Reviewing Federal Prisoner’s Disciplinary Violations, Aug. 1, 2022. Disciplinary Hearings, Daubert Standards.
- Ninth Circuit Announces Panels of Court of Appeals May Fashion Remedy When District Court Commits Daubert Error, Dec. 15, 2020. Daubert Standards, Reliability of Evidence/Testimony.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.