Skip navigation

U.S. v. Kincade, No. 02-50380 (9th Cir.) (345 F.3d 1095) (October 2, 2003) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)

Here, in a case of first impression for any Court of Appeals, a divided panel from the Ninth Circuit held that the forced extraction of blood from parolees pursuant to the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act (42 U.S.C. § 14135a) requires individualized suspicion under the Fourth Amendment, and that the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login