Skip navigation

U.S. v. Panfil, No. 02-15627 (11th Cir.) (338 F.3d 1299) (July 25, 2003) (Per Curiam)

Here the Court rejected a challenge that 18 U.S.C. § 2422 was unconstitutionally overbroad and vague on its face.

The defendant in this case pled guilty to using the Internet to persuade a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The District Court ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login