Singletary v. Reilly, No. 04-7013 (D.C. Cir.) (452 F.3d 868) (July 7, 2006) (Judge Janice Rogers Brown)
Loaded on June 1, 2006
published in Punch and Jurists
June 05, 2006
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Hearsay Evidence.
In this decision, her first major criminal decision since her appointment to the D.C. Circuit last summer, Judge Janice Rogers Brown has probably surprised a lot of people. Her contentious, controversial and long-debated appointment to the Court was vehemently opposed by more than 150 state and national organizations, including …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for the C.D.Cal., No. 06-73352 (9th Cir.) (453 F.3d 1136) (July 5, 2006) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 04-4992-cr (2nd Cir.) (446 F.3d 272) (May 1, 2006) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
- U.S. v. Miller, No. 05-2978 (7th Cir.) (450 F.3d 270) (June 7, 2006) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- Washington v. Recuenco, No. 05-83 (U.S. Supreme Court) (548 U.S. 212; 126 S.Ct. 2546) (June 26, 2006) (Justice Thomas)
- U.S. v. Staffeldt, No. 05-10243 (9th Cir.) (451 F.3d 578) (June 26, 2006) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- U.S. v. Gonzalez-Lopez, No. 05-352 (U.S. Supreme Court) (548 U.S. 140; 126 S.Ct. 2557) (June 26, 2006) (Justice Scalia)
- Singletary v. Reilly, No. 04-7013 (D.C. Cir.) (452 F.3d 868) (July 7, 2006) (Judge Janice Rogers Brown)
- U.S. v. Vampire Nation (a/k/a Frederic H. Banks), No. 05-1715 (3rd Cir.) (451 F.3d 189) (June 20, 2006) (Judge Franklin S. Van Antwerpen)
More from these topics:
- Delaware Supreme Court Announces Four-Part Plain Error Framework, Aligning Prejudice Standard With Federal Approach Requiring Reasonable Probability of Different Outcome, March 1, 2026. Preservation of Appellate Rights/Issues, Failure to Object, Hearsay Evidence, Confrontation Clause, Plain Error.
- Maine Supreme Judicial Court Vacates Conviction Based on Confrontation Clause Where Toxicologist Testified About Toxicology Tests Performed by Others, Which SCOTUS Rejected in Smith v. Arizona, Oct. 15, 2025. Forensic Sciences, Testimonial Statements, Crime Lab Reports, Hearsay Evidence, Expert and Opinion Testimony.
- Mississippi Supreme Court Vacates Convictions, Holding Multiple Errors by State Resulted in ‘Legal Chaos’ That Deprived Defendant of Right to Fair Trial Under ‘Cumulative-Error Doctrine’, May 15, 2025. Fifth Amendment, Prejudicial Spillover, Hearsay Evidence, Graphic and Inflammatory Evidence.
- Maryland Supreme Court Clarifies Process for Admitting Co-Conspirator’s Hearsay Statements During Police Interview Under ‘Declaration Against Penal Interest’ Exception, Trial Court Must ‘Parse’ Interview to Determine Admissibility of Each Statement, Feb. 1, 2025. Standard of Review, Police Interrogations, Evidence - Admissibility, Hearsay Evidence, Co-conspirator Statements.
- Washington Appellate Court Reverses Parole Revocation Based on Hearsay, Nov. 15, 2024. Hearsay Evidence, Revocation Proceedings.
- Rhode Island Supreme Court Holds Temporal Requirement of ‘Recent Fabrication’ Exception to Hearsay Rule Not Satisfied and Scribbled Note Made by Child Victim of Sexual Abuse Years After Alleged Events Not ‘Excited Utterance’, Oct. 1, 2024. Sexual Abuse of a Minor, Sexual Abuse - Aggravated, Fabrication of Evidence, Sexual Abuse/Harrassment/Exploitation, Hearsay Evidence.
- First Circuit: Sentencing May Not Be Based Upon Unreliable Hearsay Testimony, Aug. 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Unreliable and Unsubstantiated Assertions, Hearsay Evidence.
- Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies There Is No Per Se Rule Excluding Self-Serving Hearsay, Sept. 1, 2023. Pro Se Issues, Hearsay Evidence, Exclusionary Rule.
- Missouri Supreme Court: Use of Out-of-Court Statement Admitted at Trial Exceeded Limited Purpose of Exception to Rule Against Hearsay Upon Which It Was Admitted, Feb. 15, 2023. Hearsay Evidence.
- Fifth Circuit: Officer’s Testimony About CI’s Controlled Buy That He Did Not Personally Witness Violates Confrontation Clause, Sept. 15, 2022. Informants, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Hearsay Evidence.