U.S. v. Joseph, No. 06-5911-cr (2nd Cir.) (542 F.3d 13) (September 9, 2008) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 2008
published in Punch and Jurists
October 20, 2008
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Confrontation Clause/Rights.
Conviction for using the Internet to solicit a person defendant believed to be a minor to engage in sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), is vacated and case is remanded for a new trial where the jury was permitted to convict on an invalid legal basis.
…
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Humphries v. County of Los Angeles, No. 05-56467 (9th Cir.) (547 F.3d 1117) (November 5, 2008) (Judge Jay S. Bybee)
- U.S. v. Ali, No. 06-cr-200 (ENV) (E.D.N.Y.) (561 F.Supp.2d 296) (June 24, 2008) (Judge Eric N. Vitaliano)
- U.S. v. Anderson, No. 07-3654 (7th Cir.) (547 F.3d 831) (November 5, 2008) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 06-50599 (9th Cir.) (547 F.3d 1188) (November 6, 2008) (Judge Jay S. Bybee)
- U.S. v. Losovsky, No. 06 Cr. 857 (S.D.N.Y.) (571 F.Supp.2d 545) (August 4, 2008) (Judge Victor Marrero)
- U.S. v. Ali, No. 1:06-cr-200 (ENV) (E.D.N.Y.) (561 F.Supp.2d 265) (March 7, 2008) (Judge Eric N. Vitaliano)
- U.S. v. Joseph, No. 06-5911-cr (2nd Cir.) (542 F.3d 13) (September 9, 2008) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
- U.S. v. Gardellini, No. 07-3089 (D.C. Cir.) (545 F.3d 1089) (November 14, 2008) (Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh)
- U.S. v. Brooks, No. 07-CR-00187 (CPS) (E.D.N.Y.) (2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85658) (October 23, 2008) (Judge Charles P. Sifton)
More from these topics:
- SCOTUS Holds Sixth Amendment Requires Case-Specific Necessity Determination to Screen Child Witnesses, Rejecting Reliance on Mandatory State Statutes Based on Generalized Legislative Findings, Dec. 15, 2025. Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Confrontation Clause.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Witness Wearing Surgical Mask During Pandemic Is Denial of Sixth Amendment Right to Face-to-Face Confrontation and No General Exception to This Right for Pandemic or ‘Other Global Events’ Such as Wars and Natural, Feb. 15, 2025. COVID-19, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Practitioner Exception.
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Exculpatory No Doctrine, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- SCOTUS Announces Confrontation Clause Prohibits Expert Witness From Testifying About Non-Testifying Expert’s Statements Regarding Forensic Testing Performed by Non-Testifying Expert in Support of Testifying Expert’s Opinion Testimony at Trial, Jan. 15, 2025. Forensic Sciences, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Exclusion of Witnesses at Trial, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Montana Supreme Court: Expert Witness Testimony Presented Via Two-Way Video Conferencing Technology Violates Confrontation Clause, Dec. 1, 2024. Eyewitness Testimony, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Confrontation Clause, Sentencing by Videoconferencing.
- Idaho Supreme Court Admitting Video of Child-Witness Interviews at Trial Violates Confrontation Clause, June 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Video Cameras, Crawford, Testimonial Statements.
- California Court of Appeal: Confrontation Clause Violated Where Defense Prohibited From Cross-Examining Prosecution Witness About Biased Motivation and Fabrication, Jan. 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Cross-Examination, Witnesses - Examination of, Cooperating Witnesses, Scope of.
- Fifth Circuit: Officer’s Testimony About CI’s Controlled Buy That He Did Not Personally Witness Violates Confrontation Clause, Sept. 15, 2022. Informants, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Hearsay Evidence.
- Idaho Supreme Court: Telephonic Testimony Violated Defendant’s Sixth Amendment Right to Confrontation, June 15, 2022. Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- SCOTUS Rejects ‘Opening the Door’ Rule to Correct ‘Misleading Impression’ as Exception to Confrontation Clause Allowing Admission of Unconfronted Testimonial Hearsay, March 15, 2022. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Present Sense Impression.