Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Grant, No. 07-3831 (6th Cir.) (636 F.3d 803) (January 11, 2011) (Judge Julia Smith Gibbons)

Loaded on Jan. 24, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists January 24, 2011
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Factors To Be Considered.

Here a divided en banc court debated, but did not fully resolve, the issue of whether and to what extent a district court may consider factors beyond substantial assistance in ruling on a Government motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Rule 35(b).

In U.S. v. Grant, 567 F.3d 776 ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Harrington v. Richter, No. 09-587 (U.S. Supreme Court) (562 U.S. 86; 131 S.Ct. 770) (January 19, 2011) (Justice Kennedy)
  2. Premo v. Moore, No. 09-658 (U.S. Supreme Court) (562 U.S. 115; 131 S.Ct. 733) (January 19, 2011) (Justice Kennedy)
  3. U.S. v. Leal-Felix, No. 09-50426 (9th Cir.) (625 F.3d 1118) (November 11, 2010) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
  4. American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois v. Alvarez, No. 10 C 5235 (N.D.Ill.) (2011 WL 66030) (January 10, 2011) (Judge Suzanne B. Conlon)
  5. U.S. v. Grant, No. 07-3831 (6th Cir.) (636 F.3d 803) (January 11, 2011) (Judge Julia Smith Gibbons)
  6. Abdah v. Obama, No. 05-5224 (D.C. Cir.) (630 F.3d 1047) (January 11, 2011) (Per Curiam)
  7. U.S. v. Renzi, No. CR08-212 TUC DCB BPV (D.Ariz.) (722 F.Supp.2d 1100) (June 4, 2010) (Judge David C. Bury)

More from these topics: