U.S. v. Renzi, No. CR08-212 TUC DCB BPV (D.Ariz.) (722 F.Supp.2d 1100) (June 4, 2010) (Judge David C. Bury)
Loaded on Jan. 24, 2011
published in Punch and Jurists
January 24, 2011
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Suppression.
Here the Court upheld a sweeping suppression order by a Magistrate Judge barring the Government from using unlawfully intercepted and privileged communications between the defendant and his counsel that went far beyond the scope of the wiretap order.
This lengthy decision involves a rare successful challenge to a …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Renzi, No. CR08-212 TUC DCB BPV (D.Ariz.) (722 F.Supp.2d 1100) (June 4, 2010) (Judge David C. Bury)
- Abdah v. Obama, No. 05-5224 (D.C. Cir.) (630 F.3d 1047) (January 11, 2011) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Grant, No. 07-3831 (6th Cir.) (636 F.3d 803) (January 11, 2011) (Judge Julia Smith Gibbons)
- American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois v. Alvarez, No. 10 C 5235 (N.D.Ill.) (2011 WL 66030) (January 10, 2011) (Judge Suzanne B. Conlon)
- U.S. v. Leal-Felix, No. 09-50426 (9th Cir.) (625 F.3d 1118) (November 11, 2010) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- Premo v. Moore, No. 09-658 (U.S. Supreme Court) (562 U.S. 115; 131 S.Ct. 733) (January 19, 2011) (Justice Kennedy)
- Harrington v. Richter, No. 09-587 (U.S. Supreme Court) (562 U.S. 86; 131 S.Ct. 770) (January 19, 2011) (Justice Kennedy)
More from these topics:
- Oregon Supreme Court Announces Article I, Section 9, of State Constitution Protects Privacy in Internet Browsing Conducted Over Public Wi-Fi Networks, April 1, 2026. Searches - Cellphones/Computers/Internet, Warrantless Searches, Electronic Surveillance, State Constitutional Claims, Suppression.
- New York Court of Appeals Holds Generic Physical Description Insufficient to Justify Pursuit in Mistaken Identity Case, and Suspect’s Flight Cannot Support Reasonable Suspicion Absent Evidence He Knew He Was Fleeing Law Enforcement, April 1, 2026. Reasonable Suspicion, Fruit of the Poisonous Tree, Suppression, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions, Terry Stops.
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Announces State Wiretap Statute Requires Suppression of Both Audio and Video Components of Audiovisual Footage of Unlawfully Intercepted Oral Communication Showing Defendant as Party to Communication, March 15, 2025. Videotaping, Wiretap Evidence, Suppression.
- Ninth Circuit: Defense Counsel Ineffective for Failing to Move to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Police Officer Trespassing on Curtilage of Defendant’s Home, Feb. 1, 2025. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Motions To Suppress, Searches - Home/Curtilage, Suppression.
- California Court of Appeal: Defendant’s Conversation With Officers Not Consensual Based on Officers’ Positioning and Manner of Approaching Legally Parked Vehicle so Evidence Obtained Resulting From Conversation Must Be Suppressed, Aug. 15, 2024. Vehicle Searches, Consensual Encounters, Suppression, Miranda.
- New York Court of Appeals Suppresses Evidence Because Police Lacked Reasonable Suspicion Necessary for Level 3 Stop and Frisk Under De Bour Framework, Oct. 1, 2023. Frisks after an initial stop, Reasonable Suspicion, Suppression.
- Sixth Circuit Suppresses Evidence Obtained as a Result of Warrant That Lacked Probable Cause of Criminal Activity in Arson Investigation, Sept. 1, 2023. Probable Cause, Suppression.
- California Supreme Court Announces Warrantless Search Parole Condition Does Not Dissipate Taint of Unlawful Detention and Subsequent Search, Suppresses Evidence, Aug. 1, 2023. Warrantless Searches, Suppression, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release.
- California Supreme Court Announces Government’s Continuing Brady Obligations and Ethical Duty of Disclosure During Habeas Proceedings Regarding Alleged Exculpatory Evidence Available at Time of Trial but Suppressed, April 15, 2023. Habeas Corpus, Suppression, Exculpatory Evidence - Disclosure Obligations.
- Oregon Supreme Court: Federal Law Prohibits Elected DA’s Delegation of Wiretap Authority and Overbroad Initial Search Warrant Requires Suppression of Evidence Obtained as Result of Over 20 Subsequent Warrants, Feb. 15, 2023. Warrantless Searches, Suppression, Wiretaps/Wiretap Evidence.