Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Bout, No. 08 CR 365(SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (860 F.Supp.2d 303) (February 24, 2012) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)

Loaded on Nov. 26, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists November 26, 2012
Filed under: Eighth Amendment, Punch And Jurists.

In America, it has become a cardinal operating principle of the courts that they will rarely interfere with the decisions of prison administrators about prison conditions - no matter how harsh or arbitrary those conditions may appear to be. And that guiding principle has become virtually immutable, in large …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Bout, No. 08 CR 365(SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (860 F.Supp.2d 303) (February 24, 2012) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)
  2. U.S. v. Corey, No. 12-20184-CR (S.D.Fla.) (861 F.Supp.2d 1341) (May 16, 2012) (Judge Federico A. Moreno)
  3. Vance v. Rumsfeld, No. 10-1687 (7th Cir.) (701 F.3d 193) (November 7, 2012) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
  4. U.S. v. Godat, No. 11-3536 (8th Cir.) (688 F.3d 399) (August 8, 2012) (Judge Raymond W. Gruender)
  5. U.S. v. Maloney, No. 11-50311 (9th Cir.) (699 F.3d 1130) (November 14, 2012) (Judge N. Randy Smith)

More from these topics: